Document scores

• Critical Missing Alt Text Slide 2 Auto-fix available 100% confidence

  An image on slide 2 has no alt text.

  Why it matters:

  Screen reader users hear nothing for this image, so any information it carries is lost to them.

  Suggested fix:

  Add a short description of what the image shows and why it is on the slide, or mark it as decorative if it carries no meaning.

• Critical Color Contrast Slide 2 Auto-fix available 100% confidence

  Text on slide 2 has a contrast ratio of 2.54:1, below the 3.0:1 minimum.

  Why it matters:

  Low-contrast text is hard or impossible to read for people with low vision, color blindness, or anyone viewing in bright light.

  Suggested fix:

  Darken the text or lighten the background until the contrast ratio meets WCAG AA.

• Moderate Poor Alt Text Slide 5 Auto-fix available 85% confidence

  The alt text "IMG_2041.jpg" on slide 5 looks like a file name.

  Why it matters:

  Alt text like this tells screen reader users an image exists without conveying what it shows.

  Suggested fix:

  Rewrite the alt text to describe the content and purpose of the image in a sentence or less.

• Moderate Missing Slide Title Slide 4 Auto-fix available 100% confidence

  Slide 4 has no title.

  Why it matters:

  Screen reader users rely on slide titles to know where they are and to jump between slides.

  Suggested fix:

  Add a short, descriptive title using the slide layout's title placeholder.

• Moderate Small Font Size Slide 3 Auto-fix available 100% confidence

  Text on slide 3 is set at 8pt, below the 9pt minimum for presentations.

  Why it matters:

  Small text excludes people with low vision and anyone viewing the deck from a distance or on a small screen.

  Suggested fix:

  Increase the font size to at least 9pt — 18pt or larger for body text is a safer target for presentations.

• Moderate Table Structure Slide 4 90% confidence

  A 3×3 table on slide 4 has no header row.

  Why it matters:

  Without headers, screen reader users hear cell values with no indication of what each column means.

  Suggested fix:

  Make the first row a header row that labels each column.

• Moderate Link Quality Slide 2 Auto-fix available 90% confidence

  The link "click here" on slide 2 uses generic text that does not describe its destination.

  Why it matters:

  Screen reader users often skim a list of links out of context; text like this gives no clue where the link goes.

  Suggested fix:

  Rewrite the link text to describe the destination, e.g. "Q3 campaign results" instead of "click here".

• Minor Reading Order Slide 2 Auto-fix available 70% confidence

  The reading order on slide 2 does not match its visual layout.

  Why it matters:

  Screen readers announce elements in document order. When that differs from the visual order, the slide is heard as a jumble.

  Suggested fix:

  Reorder the elements so assistive technology reads the slide top to bottom, left to right.

• Minor Duplicate Slide Titles Slide 3 Auto-fix available 100% confidence

  Slide 3 repeats the title "Campaign Performance" (also used on slides 2, 3).

  Why it matters:

  People navigating by slide title cannot tell duplicated slides apart.

  Suggested fix:

  Give each slide a unique, descriptive title — for continued content, add a qualifier like "(continued)" or a subtopic.

• Minor Empty Text Box Slide 3 Auto-fix available 100% confidence

  Slide 3 contains an empty text box.

  Why it matters:

  Screen readers stop on empty text boxes and announce nothing, which is confusing and slows navigation.

  Suggested fix:

  Delete the empty text box, or add the intended content.

• Manual Review Decorative Image Candidate Slide 6 Auto-fix available 60% confidence

  An image on slide 6 looks decorative (very small or line-shaped) and has no alt text.

  Why it matters:

  Decorative images should be explicitly marked so screen readers skip them instead of announcing an unlabeled image.

  Suggested fix:

  If this image is purely visual polish, mark it as decorative. If it carries meaning, add alt text instead.

• Manual Review Embedded Video Review Slide 5 100% confidence

  Slide 5 embeds a video ("Acme Co. success story").

  Why it matters:

  Videos need captions for deaf and hard-of-hearing viewers, and audio descriptions when visuals carry meaning.

  Suggested fix:

  Confirm the video has accurate captions and, if needed, an audio-described version.

• Manual Review Color Only Communication Slide 4 50% confidence

  Slide 4 refers to content by color ("in red").

  Why it matters:

  Color-blind users and screen reader users cannot perceive which items are "in red" — the meaning is lost.

  Suggested fix:

  Pair the color with a second cue such as a label, icon, or pattern, and reference that cue in the text.

• Manual Review Speaker Notes Coverage Auto-fix available 80% confidence

  5 of 6 slides have no speaker notes (slides 2, 3, 4, 5, 6).

  Why it matters:

  Speaker notes carry the story behind each slide for people reviewing the deck on their own, including assistive technology users.

  Suggested fix:

  Add brief speaker notes summarizing the point of each slide.